'Dirty tricks' claims in Fulham stadium row

Laura Smith13 April 2012

In the genteel west London suburbs around Craven Cottage, home to Fulham Football Club, tempers are flaring.

Accusations are flying, and rifts over the proposed £70million extension of the stadium threaten to become a war of David and Goliath proportions - although which side is the little man and which is the giant can at times be difficult to fathom.

Under the controversial extension plan, the actual Craven Cottage - from which the ground takes its name - would be demolished. Although the project was approved by Hammersmith and Fulham's planning department last month, the strength of local opposition may force Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott to "call it in" this week, which would mean a public hearing and could take up to a year.

This would be a disaster for the First Division club, which has until August next year to become an all-seater stadium under post-Hillsborough guidelines. Fulham seem certain to win promotion this season to the Premiership under Jean Tigana, but if the club misses the all-seater deadline, its licence will not be renewed. Michael Fiddy, managing director of the club, said: "It would be disastrous for the club's future if we have that kind of delay."

Mudslinging abounds between the two factions. In one corner is the Fulham Alliance, a residents' group set up specifically to challenge the extension proposals, and which says it has the support of between 1,500 and 2,000 local people.

Their objections range from fears of traffic congestion if capacity is expanded from 21,000 to 30,000 as proposed, to claims that interrupted wind flows caused by the height of the proposed stadium would lead to the closure of the nearby Ranelagh Sailing Club.

In the opposing corner is Fulham United, another group of residents who, in their own words, "support the right of our local football club to remain at their historic home of the past 103 years" and obliquely refer to the Alliance as "an affluent and vocal minority" on their website.

The latest row surrounds Mori research into local opinion commissioned by Fulham United. Not surprisingly, both United and the Alliance claim the results support their cause and both claim dirty tricks by the other.

Howard Palmer, of the Fulham Alliance, said: "Fulham United have misrepresented the results of the research and refused to release details until this month - more than a year after it was commissioned. It's an absolute scandal.

"We've always felt they have been vitriolic towards us. They accuse anyone who doesn't want the development to go ahead of being toffee-nosed. I am pretty confident they are getting financial support from somewhere for what is an expensive campaign."

But Clive Lederer, treasurer for Fulham United, rejects any suggestion of impropriety. He said: "As far as we are concerned we didn't misrepresent what was found in the research. It was never our intention to lie. I think the Fulham Alliance have decided to play dirty and undermine us.

"Our funding comes from individual subscriptions from Fulham supporters and from the Fulham Supporters' Club. We are totally independent from Fulham Football Club."

Mr Fiddy agreed. "The Alliance are having the last throw of the dice," he said. "They have come to a stage where they are attempting to muddy the waters by suggesting impropriety. They are anti-football and do not want Fulham FC to remain in Fulham."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in