Gadzooks, it's Philip!

The bluebottle on Prince Philipâ™s naked shoulder is meant to represent the human part in the food chain
The Weekender

Sign up to our free weekly newsletter for exclusive competitions, offers and theatre ticket deals

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

This is the royal portrait Prince Philip never wanted to see.


The controversial new painting, unveiled today by artist Stuart Pearson Wright, was the target of a typically outspoken tirade when Philip first saw an early version of his likeness.

"Gadzooks!", he said, adding, with profound relief, "as long as I don't have to have it on my wall!" What his artistic criticism will be of the finished version, one can only guess.

Philip, 83, is pictured barechested with a bluebottle on his shoulder and a plant growing from a finger. It is called Homo sapiens, Lepidum sativum and Calliphora vomitoria.

Two years ago Pearson Wright, 28, was chosen by the Duke of Edinburgh to paint his portrait on behalf of the Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), of which he is president.

The artist was given four onehour sittings - until the Prince saw the work in progress. Asked by the artist if he thought it a good likeness, he replied: "I bloody well hope not!" That marked the end of their working relationship.

The artist submitted his work to the RSA but it was rejected. Instead he gave them a toneddown version showing only the Prince's head. Pearson Wright finally unveiled his finished portrait this afternoon to publicise a new show at the Jerwood Space, SE1, in which his works are exhibited.

He said: "Philip said he wouldn't want it on his wall, but I knew the completed portrait would have to see the light of day at some point. I guess I'll sell it."

The portrait was completed thanks to photographs and a model - "an elderly gentleman from Bethnal Green" - who posed for the Prince's figure. Pearson Wright said he depicted the Prince apparently without clothes because of "a desire to strip the genre of portrait painting of its historical function as a propaganda tool for the wealthy and powerful."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT