Ben Affleck apologises for demanding his slave-owning ancestor be cut from family history show

 
Apology: Ben Affleck omitted a slave-owning relative from PBS show. (Picture: EPA/MICHAEL REYNOLDS)
Jennifer Ruby22 April 2015
The Weekender

Sign up to our free weekly newsletter for exclusive competitions, offers and theatre ticket deals

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A-lister Ben Affleck has apologised to fans after deliberately omitting details of a slave-owning ancestor from a PBS documentary about his family tree.

In a Facebook post, Affleck claims that he was ‘embarrassed’ by the fact that ancestor James McGuire owned eight slaves during the 1840s.

The star goes on to admit that he lobbied for the information to be withheld from the programme, as he didn’t want his family’s reputation to be tarnished.

He wrote: “After an exhaustive search of my ancestry for Finding Your Roots, it was discovered that one of my distant relatives was an owner of slaves.

'I didn't want any television show about my family to include a guy who owned slaves. I was embarrassed. The very thought left a bad taste in my mouth.'

Statement: Ben Affleck has spoken out. (Picture: Facebook/Ben Affleck)

He added: “It's important to remember that this isn't a news program. Finding Your Roots is a show where you voluntarily provide a great deal of information about your family, making you quite vulnerable.

“The assumption is that they will never be dishonest but they will respect your willingness to participate and not look to include things you think would embarrass your family.”

Affleck, who convinced producers of the PBS show to cut the slavery segment, claims that he has now regrets his decision.

He added: 'I regret my initial thoughts that the issue of slavery not be included in the story.

“We deserve neither credit nor blame for our ancestors and the degree of interest in this story suggests that we are, as a nation, still grappling with the terrible legacy of slavery. It is an examination well worth continuing.”

Adding an additional comment to his original post, Affleck wrote: "Thanks for the comments here. To clarify, because I see this story being framed as "censorship" on some sites, when I told Skip I was uneasy about the slave owner, he told me he had not included it in his preliminary cut because there wasn't much detail - a name and no details, so he wasn't going with it to begin with.

He also told me they would do a book later with a more complete story, and I said I would be happy to participate and talk about the issues more broadly."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in