Rihanna wins Topshop T-shirts fight

Rihanna has won a High Court battle over Topshop selling T-shirts with her image on them after a judge ruled her fans may have been deceived
31 July 2013

Singer Rihanna has won a legal row about a T-shirt with Topshop after a High Court judge ruled her fans might have been deceived into thinking she had endorsed it.

Topshop had sold the T-shirt - which bore an image of Rihanna taken from a photograph - between March and August 2012, Mr Justice Birss was told. The High Street store had no "licence" from Rihanna to sell the shirt. And the singer had taken legal action claiming that selling it without her permission infringed her rights.

Topshop disputed her claim saying nothing on labelling suggested the T-shirt had been authorised by Rihanna, and bosses said the public had no expectation that clothes were authorised by people shown in an image.

But Mr Justice Birss ruled in Rihanna's favour - after analysing evidence at a trial in London earlier this month. The judge said Topshop's sale of the T-shirt without her permission was "passing off".

"I accept that a good number of purchasers will buy the T-shirt without giving the question of authorisation any thought at all, in my judgment a substantial portion of those considering the product will be induced to think it is a garment authorised by the artist. The persons who do this will be the Rihanna fans," said Mr Justice Birss.

"For those persons the idea that it is authorised will be part of what motivates them to buy the product. I am quite satisfied that many fans of Rihanna regard her endorsement as important. She is their style icon. Many will buy a product because they think she has approved of it. Others will wish to buy it because of the value of the perceived authorisation itself. In both cases they will have been deceived."

He said a "substantial number" of buyers were likely to have been deceived into buying the Rihanna T-shirt because of a "false belief" that it had been authorised by the singer. The judge said that was damaging to her "goodwill" and represented a loss of control over her reputation in the "fashion sphere".

He said it was for the singer not Topshop to choose what garments the public thought were endorsed by her. And he added: "I find that Topshop's sale of this Rihanna T-shirt without her approval was an act of passing off." The judge made no assessment of damages in his written ruling - he only weighed arguments about whether the use of the image had been justified. Topshop said later that damages had yet to be assessed.

A Topshop spokeswoman said bosses were "surprised", "disappointed" and "perplexed" by the ruling - and considering an appeal. "There was no intention by Topshop to create the appearance of an endorsement or promotion," said the spokeswoman. "We do not believe it conveyed any false message to our customers."

She added: "There was no evidence of consumer confusion to support the judge's conclusion. However it does appear that in this case Topshop's reputation and popularity has worked against us."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in