War with North Korea is a real possibility, think tank warns

North Korea crisis: A respected think tank has warned a war with the rogue regime is a 'real possibility'
Sean Morrison @seanmorrison_28 September 2017

A war with North Korea is a “real possibility” and hundreds of thousands of people are likely to be killed or injured, a respected think tank has warned.

The Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) said, in a disturbing assessment of the crisis sparked by Pyongyang’s nuclear missile testing, that combat would “not be surgical or short”.

There is a growing risk that Donald Trump will decide to “resolve” the issue “sooner rather than later”, according to the defence think tank.

In its report, researchers said: “With North Korea making rapid progress in its missile and nuclear programmes, time is not on diplomacy's side.”

It added: “War is now a real possibility."

The White House dismissed the claim but Mr Trump has insisted if the US was forced to defend itself against the rogue state "we will have no choice but to totally destroy" the country.

In the Rusi report, written by its deputy director general, Malcolm Chalmers, a number of ways a war could be started are set out, such as a pre-emptive strike by Pyongyang if it believed the US was planning a surprise attack.

Washington could be provoked into an assault if North Korean test missiles were fired into the ocean near California or Guam, an American territory, it said.

An outbreak of war would be likely to involve an early large-scale US-led air and cyber offensive, followed by retaliation by Pyongyang against South Korea - where around 8,000 Britons live - and American bases in the region using conventional, chemical or possibly nuclear weapons.

That would mean a full-scale invasion of the state would be highly likely, the report said.

Even without the use of nuclear weapons, the casualties would probably reach the hundreds of thousands and the war would also have "far-reaching consequences" for the global economy.

A US preventive strike without South Korea's agreement would send a signal that Washington was willing to "sacrifice Seoul to protect New York".

The report calls on the UK government to continue work to intensify international sanctions on North Korea and to support efforts to find a diplomatic solution.

It must also urge the US to rule out preventive strikes and put preparations in place to deal with a range of military scenarios, the report says.

But the UK government should refuse to rush into unconditional support for US action if it launches a surprise attack and must listen to South Korea and Japan, neighbouring nations that would be hit hardest by the fallout.

The report states: "The UK government would have, at most, only a few hours to make clear how it stood on what would be one of the most momentous strategic shocks of the post-Cold War era.

"Its decision would have as profound an impact on the UK's international standing, and on its domestic politics, as the fateful decision to stand 'shoulder to shoulder' with the US in the run up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in