Barclays showdown over Barrett

Lisa Buckingham12 April 2012

BANKING giant Barclays faces a showdown with major shareholders this week over its alleged failure to consult them properly before announcing a new pay package for chief executive Matt Barrett.

Eight of the company's biggest investors are furious that they were not given enough time to consider Barrett's contract before it was made public.

Sir Nigel Rudd, chairman of the bank's remuneration committee, and Cathy Turner, head of investor relations, will attempt to placate the investors.

In an attempt to keep the Irish-born Canadian at the helm, Barclays has given Barrett a three-year pay deal potentially worth £15.3 million.

Bruised by the mauling it received when Barrett was hired in 1999 on a potential £30 million deal, the bank rushed out details of his latest contract to coincide with publication of its annual report last month.

But one leading institutional shareholder-complained at being given only an hour to scrutinise details of a faxed copy of Barrett's contract, moments before it became public.

Another shareholder told Financial Mail that he had a meeting with the bank's chairman, Sir Peter Middleton, the day before the announcement and was assured the contract had not been signed.

'We are not necessarily opposed to what they are paying Barrett - he seems to have done an OK job,' said one shareholder.

'But the way they have handled the consultations indicates the bank has no sense of risk control - they simply don't seem to have any idea of what is likely to inflame public or shareholder opinion, and that is worrying.'

Barclays was accused of insensitivity two years ago when it closed hundreds of local branches, sparking nationwide outrage.

Barrett was also the architect of a deeply unpopular scheme to charge bank customers £1 to use cash machines, which was later dropped.

Some shareholders have been particularly angered because they felt relations with Barclays had improved after the initial furore over Barrett's appointment and the branch closures fiasco.

One shareholder told Financial Mail at the time the latest package was published: 'It looks as though Barclays has reverted to type - a cynical reaction would be to conclude

that they are trying to hide something.'

Barclays said the bank had consulted major investors before announcing Barrett's package. 'We heard them express confidence in Matt and we were pleased we could be transparent about his contract.

'We have met before with some of the investors we are seeing on Thursday but we are happy to see them again to talk over the details.'

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in